Comments on: Take one hit, next thing you know you’re a thought crime addict

By: Greg Bacon

Greg Bacon — Wed, 11 Feb 2009 15:32:00 +0000

I wasn’t searching for “Sex Practices of the Bizzare” when I ran across this.

It’s amazing that when you start searching out articles on Jews or Zionists or Israel, how much dirt, sordid dirt, you can dig up.

I want to do a blog on that iniquitous practice, not sure I have the stomach for it.

By: A. Peasant

A. Peasant — Wed, 11 Feb 2009 14:53:00 +0000

That is disgusting. What are they thinking insisting the procedure is safe despite *evidence* to the contrary? More magical anti-science views from the evil…

By: Greg Bacon

Greg Bacon — Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:27:00 +0000

Here's the religion that we are told is above reproach and its practices sacrosanct.

What kind of sick and twisted being sucks a baby's penis after circumcision?

They can hide behind a religious interpetation all day long, it's still sexual abuse of a child.

Doctors Say Circumcision Ritual Still Not Safe

By Steven I. Weiss Fri. Dec 15, 2006

A long-simmering dispute over a controversial circumcision procedure with allegedly life-threatening risks will land like a hot potato on the desk of incoming New York state Governor Eliot Spitzer this January, after the administration of outgoing Republican Governor George Pataki reached an agreement with Hasidic leaders on precautions that medical experts say will do little to reduce the risks.

The circumcision procedure, known in Hebrew as metzitzah bâ€™peh, is alleged by New York City health officials to have caused at least seven herpes infections in newborn infants in recent years, at least one of which resulted in death. Investigators linked the infections to a form of the circumcision ritual in which the mouth of the circumciser, or mohel, is applied directly to the infantâ€™s circumcision wound to suck the blood away from the cut, as mandated by the Talmud. Most mohels today use a sterile tube to draw away the blood, but direct oral suction is common in Hasidic and other ultra-Orthodox communities.

The practice made headlines in early 2005, after three neonatal herpes cases, one of them fatal, were traced by investigators to a single mohel. New York City Health Commissioner Thomas Frieden spoke out against the practice and obtained a temporary injunction barring the mohel from practicing within city limits, sparking a dispute with ultra-Orthodox community leaders who insisted the ritual was safe.

The state Health Department issued its own ban on the mohel in February 2005, but withdrew it in April, after receiving a written assurance from a Hasidic businessman, Jacob Spitzer, that the community was instituting its own self-policing procedures, according to documents obtained by the Forward.

Frieden briefly considered relaxing his ban, but reversed himself in November, after an infant was hospitalized with a herpes infection that had spread to his spinal column according to sources in the city government and the Orthodox community. The state health commissioner, Antonia Novello, reached an agreement in separate negotiations with Hasidic leaders in June to continue under an agreed-upon safety protocol. However, an investigation by the Forward has found that the protocol adopted by Novello relied on measures that medical experts say would do little to reduce the risk of orally transmitting the herpes virus.

One paper, from the federal Centers for Disease Control, is cited as demanding that mohels wash their hands with antibiotic soap. Dr. Arjun Srinivisan, a CDC expert who commented on the paper, said that hand-washing does not â€œspecifically address the issue of herpes transmission,â€ since â€œthe primary risk for transmission during this procedure is from the mouth.

http://www.forward.com/articles/9654/

By: MarcLord

MarcLord — Wed, 11 Feb 2009 02:38:00 +0000

By: A. Peasant

A. Peasant — Wed, 11 Feb 2009 00:26:00 +0000

I’m glad you enjoyed. Sometimes ridicule seems to be the best treatment. Plus I’ve been very pleasantly distracted, so this is all I could manage by way of thoughtful analysis today.

Thanks for the link to Mr. Lee. That’s a very definitive position he takes. Isn’t it great when an older person makes no bones and just lays it out there? I love it. I will post this tomorrow at AA News.

By: MarcLord

MarcLord — Tue, 10 Feb 2009 22:48:00 +0000

Pez,

Dynamite treatment. Dunno how much you’re up on the gas chamber lies, but here’s a good take on it from a highly disciplined and accomplished thinker, and someone you should know:

http://viewfrommoon.blogspot.com/2006/12/gas-chamber-lies-auschwitz.html

By: A. Peasant

A. Peasant — Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:28:00 +0000

Yes, I’m sure lots of things are hidden in the Vatican’s vaults. For one thing, Lobaczewski sent his second manuscript of Political Ponerology to the Vatican, where it was never heard from again.

The Truth is Beauty blogger seems to have a good handle on the backstory with SSPX, and from what I can tell, there’s a lot more going on than meets the eye. Sis is also doing some research on it. I haven’t had too much time.

By: Greg Bacon

Greg Bacon — Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:15:00 +0000

The Vatican has a treasure trove of historical artifacts going back at least a 1,000 years or more.
Some historians and scholars would give a body part to pore over the Vatican library, but can't, it's only for the Vatican hierarchy and certain selected scholars who are limited in the scope of their search.

Did Williamson read thru the Vatican archives dating from the 1930's to 1945?

He's got the clout as a bishop to gain access.

I didn't know Williamson from Joe the Plumber before this storm blew in, but my intuition tells me he's telling the truth.

Is he the 21st Century's version of Martin Luther?

And didn't Martin have a few things to say about 16th Century Jews and their predatory money lending schemes?