Guess I’m one of the deluded ones, because I’ve seen the face of evil up close several times.

A couple of times when we ran ME’s on a baby not breathing and it was reported as a SIDS event–remember that stuff?–except it wasn’t SIDS that did the baby in.

When you’d be doing CPR on the tiny baby, you’d start noticing bruise marks here, there and several places on the baby’s body.

When the realization finally hit me of what actually happened to that poor child, I’d look up for a sec between breaths at the parents or parent and twice I saw a look on one of the parent’s face so sick and twisted that it almost made me retch.

Then the look would disappear, when they keyed in on the fact that you had tumbled on to what they had done.

One time we were able to get the SOB arrrested and he got four years, which isn’t near enough, but better than the no years the other fucker got.

Other times, I’ve wrestled with something that was trying to suck me into blackness by getting me to off myself, but it doesn’t realize how hard-headed us wops can get.

So that’s my definition of evil I’ve seen in person and call it a belief or whatnot, but to me, it does exist.

If we are indeed approaching some type of cataclysmic event of the Church vs. the anti-Christ, Lucy or whatever, then Benedict isn’t pure enough to win that type of fight.

He’s got too much blackness on his soul from all of those decades helping cover up the Church’s pedophilia scandal.

From his days as a Cardinal, when he threatened both the victims and their families with excommunication if they persisted in their claims to his days as Pope, when he helped Cardinal Law escape from Boston one step ahead of an arrest warrant and let him hide in the Vatican for his involvement in the scandal. Ratzy’s doesn’t have the purity of heart necessary to fight the good fight.

Then again, maybe Ratzy’s playing both sides of the game.

The Holocaust is Now Catholic Dogma

Enter Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX), and the man who’s currently being crucified, Bishop Richard Williamson. Archbishop Lefebvre himself had fought inside the Second Vatican Council to prevent the coup of the liberals. He also stated that the mere fact that the Council refused to condemn Communism was enough to call the Council into question. The Archbishop knew that something nefarious had happened inside the Church and sensed that he was waging a battle against powers and principalities. In terms of his plans to restore Tradition, in the Biography of Marcel Lefebvre by Bishop Tissier de Mallerais, he quotes the Archbishop as saying (pp. 500-501):

This is where the controversy over Bishop Williamson’s remarks about the actual number of Jews killed in the Holocaust comes into the scenario. If the Jews are (wittingly or unwittingly) working to bring about the reign of the anti-Christ, then part of their strategy has to be to neutralize the Church. In their effort to overturn the crucifixion and replace it with the “Shoah,” they’re trying to utilize the Church to bring this about. And any force that appears to provide resistance to this switcheroo will be seen as the gravest possible threat. Because truly, it wouldn’t have mattered if Bishop Williamson had not said a word about the Shoah, they would have found something else to try to impede the Church’s return to Tradition. Because Christ and anti-Christ cannot co-exist on equal terms - one must naturally dominate the other. And the Church returning to Tradition and her normal role as the Church Militant is the one monkey wrench that could be thrown into the plans of the anti-Christ. No other challenger intimidates them, absolutely no one else causes them to tremble. But a fully traditional Church Militant with a billion souls in her army is the one thing that could defeat their plans. And that’s what this is really all about.

http://truthisbeauty.wordpress.com/2009/02/04/the-holocaust-is-now-catholic-dogma/

Also works great to remove A SCoToma.

ASCT. Nice ring to it.
ASCT questions - Found answers.
Let’s coin it!