Remember Efraim Diveroli? In case you forgot, he’s the young twenty-something kid who landed a $300 million contract with the Pentagon, selling 50 year old ammunition from China to Afghanistan, for instance, which is totally illegal? He also sold the ammunition that exploded in Tirana, Albania on 3/15/08, killing 26 people and injuring hundreds, which is totally murderous.
He was called to testify on April 17, 2008 before Henry Waxman and the House Oversight Committee, because when all this came about and was reported in the New York Times, people wanted answers. And I’m sure you thought, that since our Congress had been made aware of the problem, that it would now be addressed and people held accountable, and so forth and so on. Right? Oh ha ha ha HA!
Three men were arrested for mass murder in what local media dubbed “Albania’s Hiroshima.” Two of them were alleged accomplices to a 23-year-old Miami Beach-based arms dealer named Efraim Diveroli, who faces trial later this year on 83 counts of fraud and conspiracy for procuring Chinese-made ammo in Albania and selling it to the Pentagon.
The charges might be difficult to prove, though. A potential lead witness in the case, Kosta Trebicka, mysteriously died in September. His body was found bloodied and sprawled across a dirt road in eastern Albania, some 50 yards from his slightly dented SUV. Trebicka had recorded a tape (now available on YouTube) in which Diveroli said corruption in that country “went up… to the prime minister and his son.”
Last week, Miami federal prosecutors retreated, allowing the return of $4.2 million of Diveroli’s property — including a new Mercedes S550 — that had been confiscated. Perhaps even more significant, Diveroli is out on bail and a Miami Beach company he owns called Ammoworks might even now be selling ammunition to the American government. This fact has been largely overlooked by prosecutors and Congress.
What can we say? Obviously, this is just one example of the reeking corruption that passes for a Federal Government in the United States. The CIA and Mossad evidently do whatever the hell they please, and Congress does NOTHING to stop them. And truly, how can they? They’ve all been compromised and entrapped by the NSA and prostitutes and illegal bribes to Cayman Island bank accounts and tax cheating and Bohemian Grove rituals and God only knows what other unspeakable crimes. They can’t say a thing. The crazies have been set loose, and they run amok in the world wrecking havoc and bringing death and destruction wherever they go. But it’s rude to notice, and even worse, somebody might call you a bad name.
#1 by Sis on February 5, 2009 - 8:53 am
….waiting for the anti-semitic accusations…..
#2 by A. Peasant on February 5, 2009 - 10:22 am
Or Conspiracy Theorist. That’s wicked bad.
#3 by MarcLord on February 5, 2009 - 11:29 am
I found a YouTube tape of this idiot doing his arms deals and posted it, and iirc predicted he wouldn’t be convicted. Too much useful initiative, which certainly inspired more admiration in certain circles than horror.
#4 by Sis on February 5, 2009 - 11:31 am
Anti
Semitic
Conspiracy
Theorist
ASCT. Nice ring to it.
ASCT questions - Found answers.
Let’s coin it!
#5 by A. Peasant on February 5, 2009 - 11:31 am
Yes, you’re right. This is the kind of thing that “impresses” people who are ethically challenged. A real go-getter, that Ephraim.
#6 by A. Peasant on February 5, 2009 - 11:42 am
Sis, is it like axing questions?
Also works great to remove A SCoToma.
#7 by Greg Bacon on February 5, 2009 - 12:15 pm
Interesting stuff at this link, lots of god vs. anti-christ stuff. And who the Jews really worship.
The Holocaust is Now Catholic Dogma
Enter Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX), and the man who’s currently being crucified, Bishop Richard Williamson. Archbishop Lefebvre himself had fought inside the Second Vatican Council to prevent the coup of the liberals. He also stated that the mere fact that the Council refused to condemn Communism was enough to call the Council into question. The Archbishop knew that something nefarious had happened inside the Church and sensed that he was waging a battle against powers and principalities. In terms of his plans to restore Tradition, in the Biography of Marcel Lefebvre by Bishop Tissier de Mallerais, he quotes the Archbishop as saying (pp. 500-501):
The Council is a non-infallible act of the Magisterium and, therefore, it is open to being influenced by a bad spirit … Therefore, we need to apply the criterion of Tradition to the various Council documents to see what we can keep, what needs clarifying, and what should be rejected.
This is where the controversy over Bishop Williamson’s remarks about the actual number of Jews killed in the Holocaust comes into the scenario. If the Jews are (wittingly or unwittingly) working to bring about the reign of the anti-Christ, then part of their strategy has to be to neutralize the Church. In their effort to overturn the crucifixion and replace it with the “Shoah,†they’re trying to utilize the Church to bring this about. And any force that appears to provide resistance to this switcheroo will be seen as the gravest possible threat. Because truly, it wouldn’t have mattered if Bishop Williamson had not said a word about the Shoah, they would have found something else to try to impede the Church’s return to Tradition. Because Christ and anti-Christ cannot co-exist on equal terms - one must naturally dominate the other. And the Church returning to Tradition and her normal role as the Church Militant is the one monkey wrench that could be thrown into the plans of the anti-Christ. No other challenger intimidates them, absolutely no one else causes them to tremble. But a fully traditional Church Militant with a billion souls in her army is the one thing that could defeat their plans. And that’s what this is really all about.
http://truthisbeauty.wordpress.com/2009/02/04/the-holocaust-is-now-catholic-dogma/
#8 by A. Peasant on February 5, 2009 - 12:22 pm
Yes, I saw that this morning. She is outstanding in both her writing and analysis and courage. You go, Sistah!
#9 by Sis on February 5, 2009 - 12:44 pm
The church seems to being doing a fine job nuetralizing itself without outside help. So it would seem, as I am instructed to forget about my worldly anxieties and just pray it away. No condemnation. No action required. Had Jesus given the same sermon to his disciples, our Bible would be 1/3 the size and we’d be sacrificing goats as we dance to disco music.
#10 by Greg Bacon on February 5, 2009 - 1:38 pm
It’s a good thesis, but I’m not sure that Benadict is the one to fight the eternal battle.
If we are indeed approaching some type of cataclysmic event of the Church vs. the anti-Christ, Lucy or whatever, then Benedict isn’t pure enough to win that type of fight.
He’s got too much blackness on his soul from all of those decades helping cover up the Church’s pedophilia scandal.
From his days as a Cardinal, when he threatened both the victims and their families with excommunication if they persisted in their claims to his days as Pope, when he helped Cardinal Law escape from Boston one step ahead of an arrest warrant and let him hide in the Vatican for his involvement in the scandal. Ratzy’s doesn’t have the purity of heart necessary to fight the good fight.
Then again, maybe Ratzy’s playing both sides of the game.
#11 by A. Peasant on February 5, 2009 - 2:03 pm
I don’t disagree. There must be some faction of the church who can defend the territory, however, and maybe we will find out who they are soon. I mean, aside from us wacky Catholics out in the hinterlands.
#12 by Greg Bacon on February 5, 2009 - 2:21 pm
There are some, like psychologists and psychiatrists, that say evil doesn’t exist, that you’re deluding yourself and it is only a case of someone being a psychopath or sociopath.
Guess I’m one of the deluded ones, because I’ve seen the face of evil up close several times.
A couple of times when we ran ME’s on a baby not breathing and it was reported as a SIDS event–remember that stuff?–except it wasn’t SIDS that did the baby in.
When you’d be doing CPR on the tiny baby, you’d start noticing bruise marks here, there and several places on the baby’s body.
When the realization finally hit me of what actually happened to that poor child, I’d look up for a sec between breaths at the parents or parent and twice I saw a look on one of the parent’s face so sick and twisted that it almost made me retch.
Then the look would disappear, when they keyed in on the fact that you had tumbled on to what they had done.
One time we were able to get the SOB arrrested and he got four years, which isn’t near enough, but better than the no years the other fucker got.
Other times, I’ve wrestled with something that was trying to suck me into blackness by getting me to off myself, but it doesn’t realize how hard-headed us wops can get.
So that’s my definition of evil I’ve seen in person and call it a belief or whatnot, but to me, it does exist.
#13 by Sis on February 5, 2009 - 2:57 pm
“Who ever” needs to act quickly and have one helluva powerful force behind him.