Archive for November 12th, 2007

Alas! Alaska!

Evidently, Alaska is a state wallowing in political corruption. And I mean wallowing. I’m just going to list some of the highlights without [snips], because there are so many, so it’s worth reading the whole thing to see it all come together with the great punchline at the end.

When the FBI came looking for corruption in Alaska politics, it found an excellent perch in Suite 604 of the Baranof Hotel in Juneau, the state capital. There, a profane septuagenarian named Bill Allen did business throughout a 2006 special session called to set taxes on the oil industry. With hundred-dollar bills in his front pocket for ease of access when lawmakers turned up with their hands out, the oil-services company executive turned in a bravura performance before the pinhole camera that federal agents installed opposite his favorite chair.

On another tape, Pete Kott, the former Republican speaker of the Alaska House of Representatives, crowed as he described beating back a tax bill opposed by oil companies. “I had to cheat, steal, beg, borrow and lie,” Kott said. “Exxon’s happy. BP’s happy. I’ll sell my soul to the devil.”

Officially, the scandal has remained confined to Juneau, where Alaska lawmakers had grown so accustomed to operating under the presumption of impropriety that several of them embroidered ball caps with the letters CBC, for “Corrupt Bastards Club.” (An Anchorage coffeehouse now offers Corrupt Bastards Brew.) But with signs that the investigation is brushing against Alaska’s lone congressman, Don Young (R), and its longtime and venerated senator Ted Stevens (R), residents of the Last Frontier are experiencing a rare spasm of soul-searching.

But Ben Stevens, the senator’s son and a former Alaska Senate president, has been at the center of the scandal from the start. When Allen pleaded guilty to bribery and conspiracy charges, he stated that almost a quarter of a million dollars in consulting fees paid to the younger Stevens was in fact bribery.

The probe has delivered low humor as well as bad behavior. In one exchange the FBI captured by wiretap, Allen handed a sexual potency pill and a sleeping pill to Kott — who later phoned, confused and upset, after mixing them up.

Not all the indictments rose from oil money. Former representative Tom Anderson last month was sentenced to five years for taking money from a consultant for a company hoping to build a prison in Alaska; the consultant was working undercover for the FBI. The Republican lawmaker’s only previous brush with the law came when his girlfriend, a fellow legislator, summoned police as they fought over bowling scores.

Much, much more where that came from. And all this time I thought Texas was the most obnoxious state in America.

Facts Are Dirty

The National Intelligence Estimate on Iran has been delayed for over a year because Dick Cheney doesn’t like the conclusions. To their everlasting credit, the intelligence people have not backed down, and now the White House will release the “unsatisfactory” draft, sans key findings.

The US National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) on Iran has been held up for more than a year in an effort to force the intelligence community to remove dissenting judgments on the Iranian nuclear program. The aim is to make the document more supportive of Vice President Dick Cheney’s militarily aggressive policy toward Iran, according to accounts provided by participants in the NIE process to two former Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) officers.

But this pressure on intelligence analysts, obviously instigated by Cheney himself, has not produced a draft estimate without those dissenting views, these sources say. The White House has now apparently decided to release the “unsatisfactory” draft NIE, but without making its key findings public.

[snip]

Cheney’s desire for a “clean” NIE that could be used to support his aggressive policy toward Iran was apparently a major factor in the replacement of John Negroponte as director of national intelligence in early 2007. Negroponte had angered neo-conservatives in the administration by telling the press in April 2006 that the intelligence community believed that it would still be “a number of years off” before Iran would be “likely to have enough fissile material to assemble into or to put into a nuclear weapon, perhaps into the next decade”.

Neo-conservatives immediately attacked Negroponte for the statement, which merely reflected the existing NIE on Iran issued in spring 2005. Robert G Joseph, the under secretary of state for arms control and an ally of Cheney, contradicted Negroponte the following day. He suggested that Iran’s nuclear program was nearing the “point of no return” - an Israeli concept referring to the mastery of industrial-scale uranium enrichment.

After replacing Negroponte with McConnell, they tried to force the intelligence community to reconsider how long it would take for Iran to make a nuclear weapon. The five to ten year estimate just doesn’t generate sufficient alarm. But the pressure didn’t work, so McConnell responded by making it more difficult to declassify the report.

The decision to withhold key judgments on Iran from the public was apparently part of a White House strategy for reducing the potential damage of publishing the estimate with the inclusion of dissenting views.

As of early October, officials involved in the NIE were “throwing their hands up in frustration” over the refusal of the administration to allow the estimate to be released, according to the former intelligence officer. But the Iran NIE is now expected to be circulated within the administration in late November, says Ray McGovern, former CIA analyst and founder of the anti-war group Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity.

The release of the Iran NIE will certainly intensify the bureaucratic political struggle over Iran policy. If the NIE includes both dissenting views on key issues, a campaign of selective leaking to news media of language from the NIE that supports Cheney’s line on Iran will soon follow, as well as leaks of the dissenting views by his opponents.

This whole Iran thing is just another giant cock-up designed to make certain people even more filthy rich than they are already while conveniently reducing the world’s population and further impoverishing America’s middle class. This is completely obvious if you are paying minimally close attention. Let’s watch together while the media people, with vast access to the halls of power and secret stores of information, come to totally different conclusions.

Speak for Yourself

Bush and Cheney spoke yesterday. I always find it interesting to read their remarks and observe their use of language.

“In their sorrow, these families need to know — and families all across our nation of the fallen — need to know that your loved ones served a cause that is good and just and noble,” Bush said. “And as their commander in chief, I make you this promise: Their sacrifice will not be in vain.”

Now certainly, you can read the remarks and take them the way he wants you to. Or you can notice the use of pronouns and phrasing. He acknowledges the families’ suffering, but not his own through the choice of a different pronoun, and it’s their loved ones that serve the good cause, not his. And this little gem: “families all across our nation of the fallen”. We are a nation of fallen people. Good to know. And note where he uses “I”, when he makes the promise that their sacrifice will not be in vain. Does he explain? No. You can think noble thoughts about that, and you probably will, but he may just as easily be referring to how this war has fulfilled PNAC plans for a permanent presence in Iraq.

What strikes me is how he tells the truth in this little paragraph, if you read it correctly. He’s only lying if the listener/reader appends his or her own conclusions to everything. And since that’s what he wants us to do, in that sense he is manipulating more than lying.

“These men and women saw the future of the terrorists’ intent for our country and they said with clear voices, ‘Not on my watch,’” Bush said of the troops.

“America is blessed to have such brave defenders. They are tomorrow’s veterans and they are bringing pride to our country. Their service is noble and it is necessary,” he said. “The enemies who attacked us six years ago want to strike our country again, and next time they hope to kill Americans on a scale that will make 9/11 pale by comparison.”

And how does he know that, pray tell?

Meanwhile, Dick Cheney spoke at Arlington.

In a 10-minute speech, Cheney said soldiers from World War I to “the current fight against terrorism” have served their country valiantly and “kept us free at the land we call home.”

I’m sorry, but that’s just awkward phrasing. Very unnatural, stiff. Also, lumping the current war together with other wars, particularly WWI and WWII, is just a cheap way to make the Iraq war noble by association.

“Free to live as we see fit, free to work, worship, speak our minds, to choose our own leaders,” the vice president said. “May the rest of us never take them for granted.”

What if the “we” is him and his cabal? I bet it is. The rest I take as sit down and shut up you ingrates.

“Our conduct of our military today and throughout our nation’s history makes this country very proud,” Cheney said. “It is our prayer they will return in victory, safely home, to live out their lives and be here to observe many Veterans Days to come.”

Our conduct of our military, eh? I don’t know about that, Sir. And it’s not our country that’s proud, it’s this country. But it’s our prayer for their return, not necessarily his. He could have said we pray, or even I pray, but he did not. Maybe he’s not the praying type.

These guys spend so much time manipulating people’s emotions with the clever use of pronouns, shifting their crimes away and spreading responsibility around on the one hand and borrowing good intentions on the other. Unfortunately, you have to parse everything they say in order to find out what the hell is going on.