Where to begin? The diplomatic ranks had a contentious meeting Wednesday because some of them will be ordered to serve in Iraq against their wishes. They consider the order a potential death sentence.
Diplomats are generally not known for flying off the handle. I guess the foreign service really does not believe that The Surge Is Working, or else they wouldn’t be staging a public mutiny.
Rice, who did not attend the meeting, was also making clear in the cable that foreign service officers have an obligation to uphold the oaths they took to carry out the policies of the government and be available to serve anywhere in the world, McCormack said.
Rich! Unlike HER BOSS, who also took an oath to uphold the Constitution of the United States, Condi does not neglect to remind these people of their obligations. Apparently some oaths are mandatory, like the ones that diplomats and soldiers take, and some are optional, like the ones the rulers of the “free” world take. Did you know this? I did not know this.
Not to be outdone in the compassioning and reminding…
At the White House, press secretary Dana Perino told reporters that President Bush understood the diplomats’ concerns but believed that both Rice and the foreign service would be able to handle the challenge in Iraq.
“The president understands that at a time of war it is distressing for some individuals to serve in those areas,” she said. “The president is concerned, but he also has confidence that Secretary Rice will handle this matter in a way that is caring for the people at the foreign service, but also ensures that the mission that the United States is on is supplemented by the foreign service officers who took an oath in order to serve their country.”
See, he understands it’s Distressing to serve in those areas. He is Concerned. But, duty calls! You go work it out downstairs now. Or, in laymen’s terms, you could think of this more like a very disparaging remark or gesture. You know what I mean. The Diplomats will definitely understand, because their job is to read between the lines.
And to top off this hypocrisy dessert, some delicious wing-nut sprinkles:
Rep. Duncan Hunter, R-Calif., the House Armed Services Committee’s top Republican, said he intends to suggest that diplomats who refuse to serve in Iraq be replaced by wounded veterans.
“Let’s replace these reluctant Nellies with America’s finest citizens,” he said in a statement. “Our wounded warriors will serve our country efficiently, effectively and with undying patriotism.”
Yes, please do suggest that. I’m sure that wounded veterans would like nothing better than the privilege of going back to Iraq to serve with “undying” patriotism. I mean that’s the way you thank people for their service.
Update: Via Froomkin, Some ideas about what George can do after he’s done presidentin.
“Three hundred and sixty-five days a year, in the wind and snow of winter and the heat and humidity of summer, let him tend to the graves of the almost 4,000 men and women who have given their lives in the debacle of Iraq. They honored their oaths, obeyed their commander-in-chief and sacrificed their lives of promise to a lying, unprincipled warmonger.
“He can begin at the grave of my grandson, Lcpl Jonathan W. Collins, killed in action on 8/8/2004.”
